Zevachim 21
Share this shiur:
This month’s learning is sponsored by Beth Balkany in honor of their granddaughter, Devorah Chana Serach Eichel. “May she grow up to be a lifelong learner.”
Masechet Zevachim
Masechet Zevachim is sponsored by Esther Kremer in loving memory of her father, Manny Gross on his third yahrzeit. “He exemplified a path of holiness and purity, living with kedushah in his everyday life.”
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
Summary
If one becomes impure, must one repeat the washing of hands and feet? A source is brought from Mishna Para 3:7 regarding the para aduma (red heifer) to suggest that re-washing is not required. However, this proof is rejected, as the laws concerning the para aduma are considered more lenient.
Can a kohen immerse his hands and feet directly in the water of the basin, or must the water be poured over them? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak cites a source to support the permissibility of immersion, but the inference is ultimately rejected.
Regarding the timing for sinking the water into its pit to prevent disqualification for the following day, three opinions are presented:
- Rabbi Chiya bar Yosef distinguishes between rites performed during the day and those at night. For daytime rites, the water must be sunk at sunset; for nighttime rites, at dawn.
- Rav Chisda maintains that for all rites, the water must be sunk at dawn.
- Rabbi Yochanan holds that once the water is sunk at the beginning of the night, it may not be raised again until morning.
Rabbi Yochanan’s position is examined in light of other statements he made that appear contradictory. The analysis also ensures his view is clearly differentiated from those of Rav Chisda and Rabbi Chiya bar Yosef, with whom he disagrees.
A challenge is raised against Rav Chisda’s opinion, but it is resolved.
This month’s learning is sponsored by Beth Balkany in honor of their granddaughter, Devorah Chana Serach Eichel. “May she grow up to be a lifelong learner.”
Masechet Zevachim
Masechet Zevachim is sponsored by Esther Kremer in loving memory of her father, Manny Gross on his third yahrzeit. “He exemplified a path of holiness and purity, living with kedushah in his everyday life.”
Today’s daf is sponsored by Joanna Rom in loving memory of her mother, Rose Rom, Sura Razel, on her seventeenth yahrzeit. “She is still with me every day, my inner teacher.”
Zevachim 21
וְהָא פָּרָה – דְּטַמּוֹיֵי מְטַמֵּינַן לֵיהּ, דִּתְנַן: מְטַמְּאִין הָיוּ הַכֹּהֵן הַשּׂוֹרֵף אֶת הַפָּרָה וּמַטְבִּילִין אוֹתוֹ, לְהוֹצִיא מִלִּבָּן שֶׁל צַדּוּקִין שֶׁהָיוּ אוֹמְרִים: בִּמְעוֹרְבֵי שֶׁמֶשׁ הָיְתָה נַעֲשֵׂית; שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ: לָא פָּסְלָה בָּהּ (מַחְשֶׁבֶת) טוּמְאָה!
And in preparation for the rite of the red heifer, we intentionally impart impurity to the priest after he has already sanctified his hands and feet, as we learned in a mishna (Para 3:7): They would render the priest who burns the heifer ritually impure and immerse him immediately, to remove a misconception from the hearts of the Sadducees by means of a public display of disregard for their ruling. As the Sadducees would say: Only by those for whom the sun set was the heifer ritual performed. The Sadducees believed that it is prohibited for an impure priest who immersed that day to burn the red heifer until sunset, when the purification process is completed. The Gemara concludes: Since this impurity does not disqualify the sanctification of his hands and feet, learn from it that impurity does not disqualify sanctification of the hands and feet in general.
שָׁאנֵי פָּרָה, הוֹאִיל דִּטְבוּל יוֹם לָא פָּסֵיל בָּהּ. אִי הָכִי, לְמָה לִי דִּמְקַדֵּשׁ? כְּעֵין עֲבוֹדָה [בָּעֵינַן].
The Gemara responds: The service of the heifer is different, as one who immersed that day is not unfit for performing it, unlike any other rite. Likewise, impurity does not disqualify the sanctification of hands and feet preceding the service of the heifer. The Gemara asks: If so, why do I require that the priest sanctify his hands and feet at all for the service of the red heifer? The Gemara responds: We require that the service of the red heifer be similar to the service of offerings performed inside the Temple.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: מַהוּ לְקַדֵּשׁ יָדָיו [וְרַגְלָיו] בַּכִּיּוֹר? ״מִמֶּנּוּ״ אָמַר רַחֲמָנָא – וְלֹא בְּתוֹכוֹ; אוֹ דִלְמָא אֲפִילּוּ בְּתוֹכוֹ?
§ A dilemma was raised before the Sages: What is the halakha with regard to a priest who wishes to sanctify his hands and feet by dipping them in the Basin rather than letting the water run from it onto them? Must one say that the priest may not do so, since the Merciful One states: “And Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet from it” (Exodus 30:19), and not inside it? Or perhaps the priest may even use water still inside it.
אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק, תָּא שְׁמַע: אוֹ שֶׁטָּבַל בְּמֵי מְעָרָה וְעָבַד – עֲבוֹדָתוֹ פְּסוּלָה. הָא מֵי כִיּוֹר דּוּמְיָא דְּמֵי מְעָרָה, וְעָבַד – עֲבוֹדָתוֹ כְּשֵׁרָה!
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: Come and hear a proof from a baraita: Or if a priest immersed in cave water and performed the service, his service is disqualified, since this is not adequate sanctification of the hands and feet. From the baraita one infers: But if he used water from the Basin in a manner similar to cave water, i.e., by immersing his hands, and performed the service, his service is valid.
לָא, מֵי מְעָרָה אִיצְטְרִיכָא לֵיהּ; שֶׁלֹּא תֹּאמַר: כׇּל גּוּפוֹ טוֹבֵל בָּהֶן – יָדָיו וְרַגְלָיו לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?!
The Gemara responds: No, it is possible that immersing one’s hands in the Basin is insufficient as well. Nevertheless, it was necessary for the baraita to mention cave water so that you shall not say: If one may immerse his entire body in cave water to purify himself, all the more so is it not clear that he may sanctify his hands and feet by immersing them in cave water? The baraita therefore teaches that despite being fit for immersion of the entire body, cave water is unfit for sanctification of the hands and feet.
אָמַר רַבִּי חִיָּיא בַּר יוֹסֵף: מֵי כִיּוֹר נִפְסָלִין לְמַתִּירִין כְּמַתִּירִין, לְאֵבָרִים כְּאֵבָרִים.
§ Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef says: The water in the Basin is disqualified by being left out, at different times of day for different rites. For rites that are permitting factors for an offering, i.e., that must be performed before the meat of the offering may be eaten, the water is disqualified at sunset, like the permitting factors themselves, which may be performed only during the day. For example, if a priest wishes to sprinkle an offering’s blood on the altar, he may not sanctify his hands and feet from the Basin unless it was sunk into its pit at sunset on the previous day, preventing the water from being disqualified. Similarly, for the burning of the offering’s limbs on the altar, which may be performed all night, the water in the Basin is disqualified at dawn, like the limbs themselves.
רַב חִסְדָּא אָמַר: אַף לְמַתִּירִין אֵין נִפְסָלִין אֶלָּא בְּעַמּוּד הַשַּׁחַר, כַּאֵבָרִין. וְרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר: כִּיּוֹר כֵּיוָן שֶׁשִּׁקְּעוֹ – שׁוּב אֵין מַעֲלֵהוּ.
Rav Ḥisda says: Even for the performance of permitting factors, the water is disqualified only at dawn, as it is for the burning of the limbs. And Rabbi Yoḥanan says: Once one has sunk the Basin into its pit at the end of the day’s service, reconnecting the water in the Basin to flowing water to prevent it from being disqualified, he may not raise it up again the entire night.
לְמֵימְרָא דְּלַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה נָמֵי לָא חֲזֵי?! וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי, אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּאִילְפָא: כִּיּוֹר שֶׁלֹּא שִׁקְּעוֹ מִבָּעֶרֶב – מְקַדֵּשׁ מִמֶּנּוּ לַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה, וּלְמָחָר אֵינוֹ מְקַדֵּשׁ!
The Gemara asks: Is this to say that if the Basin was not sunk before sunset the water inside is unfit for the night’s service as well? But doesn’t Rabbi Asi say that Rabbi Yoḥanan says in the name of Ilfa: With regard to a Basin that the priests did not sink into its pit at night, a priest sanctifies his hands and feet from it for the service of that night, and the next day he does not sanctify from it? Apparently, for purposes of the night’s service, the water in the Basin is not disqualified at sunset.
מַאי ״אֵינוֹ מַעֲלֵהוּ״ נָמֵי דְּקָאָמַר – לַעֲבוֹדַת יוֹם; אֲבָל לַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה חֲזֵי.
The Gemara responds: What does it mean when it says: He may not raise it up again? It means that he may not raise it to sanctify his hands and feet in preparation for the day’s service; but the water is fit for sanctification for the night’s service.
[אִי הָכִי] הַיְינוּ דְּרַבִּי חִיָּיא בַּר יוֹסֵף!
The Gemara asks: If so, this is the same as the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef, i.e., that for purposes of the day’s service the water in the Basin is disqualified at sunset, and for purposes of the night’s service it is disqualified at dawn.
אִיכָּא בֵּינַיְיהוּ גְּזֵירַת שִׁיקּוּעַ.
The Gemara responds: The difference between them is that according to Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef, if the water is raised at any point throughout the night, it is disqualified for sanctification prior to the day’s services. According to Rabbi Yoḥanan, the water is not disqualified unless the Basin is raised at the break of dawn, but the Sages issued a rabbinic decree of sinking the Basin into its pit all night ab initio, so that it would not be raised at dawn accidentally.
וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: קִידֵּשׁ יָדָיו לִתְרוּמַת הַדֶּשֶׁן – לְמָחָר אֵין צָרִיךְ לְקַדֵּשׁ, שֶׁכְּבָר קִידֵּשׁ מִתְּחִילַּת עֲבוֹדָה.
The Gemara asks: Does Rabbi Yoḥanan really hold that the Basin must be sunk all night? But doesn’t Rabbi Yoḥanan say: If a priest sanctified his hands and feet in preparation for the removal of the ashes before dawn, then the next day he does not need to sanctify them again, as he already sanctified them at the beginning of the day’s service? Evidently, the Basin is raised before dawn.
בִּשְׁלָמָא לְרָבָא, דְּמוֹקֵים לְהָהִיא כְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן – הָא כְּרַבִּי.
The Gemara elaborates: Granted, according to Rava, who interprets that statement in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Shimon, that sanctification of the hands and feet is not disqualified overnight (see 20a), this statement that the Basin must be sunk all night is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, who holds that sanctification of the hands and feet is disqualified at dawn. Accordingly, he holds that the water in the Basin is disqualified as well.
אֶלָּא לְאַבָּיֵי דְּמוֹקֵים לַהּ כְּרַבִּי – קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי אַדְּרַבִּי: מַאי שְׁנָא הָתָם דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ, וּמַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דְּלָא מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ?
But according to Abaye, who interprets that statement in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, the first statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi is difficult to reconcile with this other statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi: What is different there that one must sink the Basin all night, and what is different here, with regard to sanctification prior to removal of the ashes, that one does not need to sink it?
דִּמְסַלֵּק לֵיהּ וַהֲדַר מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ.
The Gemara responds: There is no contradiction. Prior to removal of the ashes, one raises the Basin and then sinks it again so that it will not remain raised at dawn and render the water disqualified.
אִי הָכִי, ״לְמָחָר אֵינוֹ מְקַדֵּשׁ״ – [אַמַּאי? אֵין צָרִיךְ לְקַדֵּשׁ.]
The Gemara asks: If so, why does Rabbi Yoḥanan say that the priest does not sanctify his hands and feet again the next day? If the water has not been disqualified, why would the priest need to avoid sanctifying his hands and feet with it? The Gemara responds: Rabbi Yoḥanan means to say that he does not need to sanctify them again for service on the same day, not that he is prohibited from doing so.
לְמֵימְרָא דִּלְמַתִּירִין מִיחְזָא חֲזֵי?! הַיְינוּ דְּרַב חִסְדָּא!
The Gemara asks: Is this to say that according to Rabbi Yoḥanan, if one raised the Basin at night and sank it again before dawn, it remains fit for sanctification prior to performing the offering’s permitting factors that day? If so, Rabbi Yoḥanan’s opinion is the same as that of Rav Ḥisda.
אִיכָּא בֵּינַיְיהוּ מִצְוַת שִׁיקּוּעַ.
The Gemara responds: The difference between them is that according to Rav Ḥisda, there is no mitzva of sinking the Basin into its pit throughout the night, whereas Rabbi Yoḥanan holds that there is a mitzva of sinking the Basin into its pit all night ab initio.
מֵיתִיבִי: לֹא הָיוּ רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ וְלֹא שׁוֹמְעִין אֶת קוֹלוֹ, עַד שֶׁשּׁוֹמְעִים קוֹל שֶׁל עֵץ שֶׁעָשָׂה בֶּן קָטִין מוּכְנִי לַכִּיּוֹר, וְהֵן אוֹמְרִים: הִגִּיעַ [עֵת] קִידּוּשׁ יָדַיִם וְרַגְלַיִם מִן הַכִּיּוֹר. מַאי, לָאו דִּמְסַלֵּק לֵיהּ? אַלְמָא מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ!
The Gemara raises an objection to the opinion of Rav Ḥisda from a mishna (Tamid 28b): The priests would not see the priest performing the removal of the ashes, nor would they hear his voice. Rather, they were unaware of his actions until they would hear the sound of the wood with which ben Katin made a mechanism for sinking the Basin into water during the night. And when they heard the sound of the mechanism, they would say to each other: The time for sanctifying hands and feet from the Basin has come. The Gemara asks: What, is it not that they heard the mechanism raising the Basin? Apparently, the mechanism would sink it during the night, in contradiction to the opinion of Rav Ḥisda, who holds that there was no need to sink it overnight.
לָא, דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ. אִי דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ – מִי מִשְׁתְּמַע קָלֵיהּ?! מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ בְּגִילְגְּלָא.
The Gemara responds: No, they heard the mechanism sinking the Basin, which had been raised all night. The Gemara asks: If the mechanism were sinking it, would its sound be audible? No mechanism is necessary to lower the Basin; it can simply be lowered with a chain. The Gemara responds: The priest would still sink it by using a wheel, which would make a sound.
לִישָּׁנָא אַחֲרִינָא: דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ בְּחוּמַרְתֵּיהּ, כִּי הֵיכִי דְּלִישְׁתְּמַע קָלֵיהּ וְלִשְׁמְעִי וְלֵיתֵי. וְהָא הֲוָה גְּבִינִי כָּרוֹז! (בי) [אַבֵּי] תְּרֵי הֶיכֵּרֵי הֲווֹ עָבְדִי; דְּשָׁמַע מֵהַאי אָתֵי, וְשָׁמַע מֵהַאי אָתֵי.
The Gemara presents another version of the answer: The priest would deliberately sink it by its wheel so that its sound would be audible, and the other priests would hear and come to begin the service. The Gemara asks: But wasn’t there Gevini the crier, who would notify the priests of the beginning of the service? The Gemara responds: They would make two conspicuous markers for the beginning of the service: The sound of the wheel and the crier. Anyone who heard from this marker would come, and anyone who heard from that marker would come.
גּוּפָא – אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא: כׇּל כִּיּוֹר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ כְּדֵי לְקַדֵּשׁ אַרְבָּעָה כֹּהֲנִים מִמֶּנּוּ – אֵין מְקַדְּשִׁין בּוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְרָחֲצוּ מִמֶּנּוּ מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו וְגוֹ׳״.
§ Having mentioned a halakha earlier (19b), the Gemara addresses the matter itself: Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, says: With regard to any Basin that does not contain enough water for four priests to sanctify their hands and feet from it, the priests may not sanctify their hands and feet with it, as it is stated: “That Moses and Aaron and his sons might wash their hands and their feet from it” (Exodus 40:31).
מֵיתִיבִי: כׇּל הַכֵּלִים מְקַדְּשִׁין – בֵּין שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן רְבִיעִית,
The Gemara raises an objection from a baraita: The priests may sanctify their hands and feet from all vessels, whether they can hold a quarter-log of water
Delve Deeper
Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.
A Daf Of Their Own –Schita By a Woman
נשים שוחטות- דף משלהן
Zevachim Daf 15-21 – Daf Yomi: One Week at a Time
ערל: בין הגדרה פיזיולוגית להגדרה מהותית- גפ”ת
A Daf Of Their Own –Defining Your Identity
ערל לב- דף משלהן
Din & Daf: The Kohen Gadol’s New Clothes: Yom Kippur as Renewal
Zevachim Daf 8-14 – Daf Yomi: One Week at a Time
A Daf Of Their Own –The Kohen’s Garments
בגדי כהונה- דף משלהן
Zevachim Daf 2-7 – Daf Yomi: One Week at a Time
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
I started last year after completing the Pesach Sugiyot class. Masechet Yoma might seem like a difficult set of topics, but for me made Yom Kippur and the Beit HaMikdash come alive. Liturgy I’d always had trouble connecting with took on new meaning as I gained a sense of real people moving through specific spaces in particular ways. It was the perfect introduction; I am so grateful for Hadran!
Minnesota, United States
My curiosity was peaked after seeing posts about the end of the last cycle. I am always looking for opportunities to increase my Jewish literacy & I am someone that is drawn to habit and consistency. Dinnertime includes a “Guess what I learned on the daf” segment for my husband and 18 year old twins. I also love the feelings of connection with my colleagues who are also learning.
Tampa, United States
When we heard that R. Michelle was starting daf yomi, my 11-year-old suggested that I go. Little did she know that she would lose me every morning from then on. I remember standing at the Farbers’ door, almost too shy to enter. After that first class, I said that I would come the next day but couldn’t commit to more. A decade later, I still look forward to learning from R. Michelle every morning.
Ra’anana, Israel
I heard the new Daf Yomi cycle was starting and I was curious, so I searched online for a women’s class and was pleasently surprised to find Rabanit Michelle’s great class reviews in many online articles. It has been a splendid journey. It is a way to fill my days with Torah, learning so many amazing things I have never heard before during my Tanach learning at High School. Thanks so much .
Panama, Panama
I started at the beginning of this cycle. No 1 reason, but here’s 5.
In 2019 I read about the upcoming siyum hashas.
There was a sermon at shul about how anyone can learn Talmud.
Talmud references come up when I am studying. I wanted to know more.
Yentl was on telly. Not a great movie but it’s about studying Talmud.
I went to the Hadran website: A new cycle is starting. I’m gonna do this
Cambridge, United Kingdom
A Gemara shiur previous to the Hadran Siyum, was the impetus to attend it.It was highly inspirational and I was smitten. The message for me was התלמוד בידינו. I had decided along with my Chahsmonaim group to to do the daf and take it one daf at time- without any expectations at all. There has been a wealth of information, insights and halachik ideas. It is truly exercise of the mind, heart & Soul
Hashmonaim, Israel
I began my journey with Rabbanit Michelle more than five years ago. My friend came up with a great idea for about 15 of us to learn the daf and one of us would summarize weekly what we learned.
It was fun but after 2-3 months people began to leave. I have continued. Since the cycle began Again I have joined the Teaneck women.. I find it most rewarding in so many ways. Thank you
New Jersey, United States
Phoenix, AZ, United States
Mamaroneck, NY, United States
Inspired by Hadran’s first Siyum ha Shas L’Nashim two years ago, I began daf yomi right after for the next cycle. As to this extraordinary journey together with Hadran..as TS Eliot wrote “We must not cease from exploration and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we began and to know the place for the first time.
Jerusalem, Israel
What a great experience to learn with Rabbanit Michelle Farber. I began with this cycle in January 2020 and have been comforted by the consistency and energy of this process throughout the isolation period of Covid. Week by week, I feel like I am exploring a treasure chest with sparkling gems and puzzling antiquities. The hunt is exhilarating.
Pennsylvania, United States
In early 2020, I began the process of a stem cell transplant. The required extreme isolation forced me to leave work and normal life but gave me time to delve into Jewish text study. I did not feel isolated. I began Daf Yomi at the start of this cycle, with family members joining me online from my hospital room. I’ve used my newly granted time to to engage, grow and connect through this learning.
Worcester, United States
See video
Raanana, Israel
I was inspired to start learning after attending the 2020 siyum in Binyanei Hauma. It has been a great experience for me. It’s amazing to see the origins of stories I’ve heard and rituals I’ve participated in my whole life. Even when I don’t understand the daf itself, I believe that the commitment to learning every day is valuable and has multiple benefits. And there will be another daf tomorrow!
Jerusalem, Israel
3 years ago, I joined Rabbanit Michelle to organize the unprecedented Siyum HaShas event in Jerusalem for thousands of women. The whole experience was so inspiring that I decided then to start learning the daf and see how I would go…. and I’m still at it. I often listen to the Daf on my bike in mornings, surrounded by both the external & the internal beauty of Eretz Yisrael & Am Yisrael!
Raanana, Israel
I learned Mishnayot more than twenty years ago and started with Gemara much later in life. Although I never managed to learn Daf Yomi consistently, I am learning since some years Gemara in depth and with much joy. Since last year I am studying at the International Halakha Scholars Program at the WIHL. I often listen to Rabbanit Farbers Gemara shiurim to understand better a specific sugyiah. I am grateful for the help and inspiration!
Berlin, Germany
I began my journey two years ago at the beginning of this cycle of the daf yomi. It has been an incredible, challenging experience and has given me a new perspective of Torah Sh’baal Peh and the role it plays in our lives
Efrat, Israel
A few years back, after reading Ilana Kurshan’s book, “If All The Seas Were Ink,” I began pondering the crazy, outlandish idea of beginning the Daf Yomi cycle. Beginning in December, 2019, a month before the previous cycle ended, I “auditioned” 30 different podcasts in 30 days, and ultimately chose to take the plunge with Hadran and Rabbanit Michelle. Such joy!
HUNTINGTON, United States
With Rabbanit Dr. Naomi Cohen in the Women’s Talmud class, over 30 years ago. It was a “known” class and it was accepted, because of who taught. Since then I have also studied with Avigail Gross-Gelman and Dr. Gabriel Hazut for about a year). Years ago, in a shiur in my shul, I did know about Persians doing 3 things with their clothes on. They opened the shiur to woman after that!
Haifa, Israel
After experiences over the years of asking to join gemara shiurim for men and either being refused by the maggid shiur or being the only women there, sometimes behind a mechitza, I found out about Hadran sometime during the tail end of Masechet Shabbat, I think. Life has been much better since then.
London, United Kingdom
Zevachim 21
וְהָא פָּרָה – דְּטַמּוֹיֵי מְטַמֵּינַן לֵיהּ, דִּתְנַן: מְטַמְּאִין הָיוּ הַכֹּהֵן הַשּׂוֹרֵף אֶת הַפָּרָה וּמַטְבִּילִין אוֹתוֹ, לְהוֹצִיא מִלִּבָּן שֶׁל צַדּוּקִין שֶׁהָיוּ אוֹמְרִים: בִּמְעוֹרְבֵי שֶׁמֶשׁ הָיְתָה נַעֲשֵׂית; שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ: לָא פָּסְלָה בָּהּ (מַחְשֶׁבֶת) טוּמְאָה!
And in preparation for the rite of the red heifer, we intentionally impart impurity to the priest after he has already sanctified his hands and feet, as we learned in a mishna (Para 3:7): They would render the priest who burns the heifer ritually impure and immerse him immediately, to remove a misconception from the hearts of the Sadducees by means of a public display of disregard for their ruling. As the Sadducees would say: Only by those for whom the sun set was the heifer ritual performed. The Sadducees believed that it is prohibited for an impure priest who immersed that day to burn the red heifer until sunset, when the purification process is completed. The Gemara concludes: Since this impurity does not disqualify the sanctification of his hands and feet, learn from it that impurity does not disqualify sanctification of the hands and feet in general.
שָׁאנֵי פָּרָה, הוֹאִיל דִּטְבוּל יוֹם לָא פָּסֵיל בָּהּ. אִי הָכִי, לְמָה לִי דִּמְקַדֵּשׁ? כְּעֵין עֲבוֹדָה [בָּעֵינַן].
The Gemara responds: The service of the heifer is different, as one who immersed that day is not unfit for performing it, unlike any other rite. Likewise, impurity does not disqualify the sanctification of hands and feet preceding the service of the heifer. The Gemara asks: If so, why do I require that the priest sanctify his hands and feet at all for the service of the red heifer? The Gemara responds: We require that the service of the red heifer be similar to the service of offerings performed inside the Temple.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: מַהוּ לְקַדֵּשׁ יָדָיו [וְרַגְלָיו] בַּכִּיּוֹר? ״מִמֶּנּוּ״ אָמַר רַחֲמָנָא – וְלֹא בְּתוֹכוֹ; אוֹ דִלְמָא אֲפִילּוּ בְּתוֹכוֹ?
§ A dilemma was raised before the Sages: What is the halakha with regard to a priest who wishes to sanctify his hands and feet by dipping them in the Basin rather than letting the water run from it onto them? Must one say that the priest may not do so, since the Merciful One states: “And Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet from it” (Exodus 30:19), and not inside it? Or perhaps the priest may even use water still inside it.
אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק, תָּא שְׁמַע: אוֹ שֶׁטָּבַל בְּמֵי מְעָרָה וְעָבַד – עֲבוֹדָתוֹ פְּסוּלָה. הָא מֵי כִיּוֹר דּוּמְיָא דְּמֵי מְעָרָה, וְעָבַד – עֲבוֹדָתוֹ כְּשֵׁרָה!
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: Come and hear a proof from a baraita: Or if a priest immersed in cave water and performed the service, his service is disqualified, since this is not adequate sanctification of the hands and feet. From the baraita one infers: But if he used water from the Basin in a manner similar to cave water, i.e., by immersing his hands, and performed the service, his service is valid.
לָא, מֵי מְעָרָה אִיצְטְרִיכָא לֵיהּ; שֶׁלֹּא תֹּאמַר: כׇּל גּוּפוֹ טוֹבֵל בָּהֶן – יָדָיו וְרַגְלָיו לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?!
The Gemara responds: No, it is possible that immersing one’s hands in the Basin is insufficient as well. Nevertheless, it was necessary for the baraita to mention cave water so that you shall not say: If one may immerse his entire body in cave water to purify himself, all the more so is it not clear that he may sanctify his hands and feet by immersing them in cave water? The baraita therefore teaches that despite being fit for immersion of the entire body, cave water is unfit for sanctification of the hands and feet.
אָמַר רַבִּי חִיָּיא בַּר יוֹסֵף: מֵי כִיּוֹר נִפְסָלִין לְמַתִּירִין כְּמַתִּירִין, לְאֵבָרִים כְּאֵבָרִים.
§ Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef says: The water in the Basin is disqualified by being left out, at different times of day for different rites. For rites that are permitting factors for an offering, i.e., that must be performed before the meat of the offering may be eaten, the water is disqualified at sunset, like the permitting factors themselves, which may be performed only during the day. For example, if a priest wishes to sprinkle an offering’s blood on the altar, he may not sanctify his hands and feet from the Basin unless it was sunk into its pit at sunset on the previous day, preventing the water from being disqualified. Similarly, for the burning of the offering’s limbs on the altar, which may be performed all night, the water in the Basin is disqualified at dawn, like the limbs themselves.
רַב חִסְדָּא אָמַר: אַף לְמַתִּירִין אֵין נִפְסָלִין אֶלָּא בְּעַמּוּד הַשַּׁחַר, כַּאֵבָרִין. וְרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר: כִּיּוֹר כֵּיוָן שֶׁשִּׁקְּעוֹ – שׁוּב אֵין מַעֲלֵהוּ.
Rav Ḥisda says: Even for the performance of permitting factors, the water is disqualified only at dawn, as it is for the burning of the limbs. And Rabbi Yoḥanan says: Once one has sunk the Basin into its pit at the end of the day’s service, reconnecting the water in the Basin to flowing water to prevent it from being disqualified, he may not raise it up again the entire night.
לְמֵימְרָא דְּלַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה נָמֵי לָא חֲזֵי?! וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי, אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּאִילְפָא: כִּיּוֹר שֶׁלֹּא שִׁקְּעוֹ מִבָּעֶרֶב – מְקַדֵּשׁ מִמֶּנּוּ לַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה, וּלְמָחָר אֵינוֹ מְקַדֵּשׁ!
The Gemara asks: Is this to say that if the Basin was not sunk before sunset the water inside is unfit for the night’s service as well? But doesn’t Rabbi Asi say that Rabbi Yoḥanan says in the name of Ilfa: With regard to a Basin that the priests did not sink into its pit at night, a priest sanctifies his hands and feet from it for the service of that night, and the next day he does not sanctify from it? Apparently, for purposes of the night’s service, the water in the Basin is not disqualified at sunset.
מַאי ״אֵינוֹ מַעֲלֵהוּ״ נָמֵי דְּקָאָמַר – לַעֲבוֹדַת יוֹם; אֲבָל לַעֲבוֹדַת לַיְלָה חֲזֵי.
The Gemara responds: What does it mean when it says: He may not raise it up again? It means that he may not raise it to sanctify his hands and feet in preparation for the day’s service; but the water is fit for sanctification for the night’s service.
[אִי הָכִי] הַיְינוּ דְּרַבִּי חִיָּיא בַּר יוֹסֵף!
The Gemara asks: If so, this is the same as the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef, i.e., that for purposes of the day’s service the water in the Basin is disqualified at sunset, and for purposes of the night’s service it is disqualified at dawn.
אִיכָּא בֵּינַיְיהוּ גְּזֵירַת שִׁיקּוּעַ.
The Gemara responds: The difference between them is that according to Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Yosef, if the water is raised at any point throughout the night, it is disqualified for sanctification prior to the day’s services. According to Rabbi Yoḥanan, the water is not disqualified unless the Basin is raised at the break of dawn, but the Sages issued a rabbinic decree of sinking the Basin into its pit all night ab initio, so that it would not be raised at dawn accidentally.
וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: קִידֵּשׁ יָדָיו לִתְרוּמַת הַדֶּשֶׁן – לְמָחָר אֵין צָרִיךְ לְקַדֵּשׁ, שֶׁכְּבָר קִידֵּשׁ מִתְּחִילַּת עֲבוֹדָה.
The Gemara asks: Does Rabbi Yoḥanan really hold that the Basin must be sunk all night? But doesn’t Rabbi Yoḥanan say: If a priest sanctified his hands and feet in preparation for the removal of the ashes before dawn, then the next day he does not need to sanctify them again, as he already sanctified them at the beginning of the day’s service? Evidently, the Basin is raised before dawn.
בִּשְׁלָמָא לְרָבָא, דְּמוֹקֵים לְהָהִיא כְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן – הָא כְּרַבִּי.
The Gemara elaborates: Granted, according to Rava, who interprets that statement in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Shimon, that sanctification of the hands and feet is not disqualified overnight (see 20a), this statement that the Basin must be sunk all night is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, who holds that sanctification of the hands and feet is disqualified at dawn. Accordingly, he holds that the water in the Basin is disqualified as well.
אֶלָּא לְאַבָּיֵי דְּמוֹקֵים לַהּ כְּרַבִּי – קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי אַדְּרַבִּי: מַאי שְׁנָא הָתָם דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ, וּמַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דְּלָא מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ?
But according to Abaye, who interprets that statement in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, the first statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi is difficult to reconcile with this other statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi: What is different there that one must sink the Basin all night, and what is different here, with regard to sanctification prior to removal of the ashes, that one does not need to sink it?
דִּמְסַלֵּק לֵיהּ וַהֲדַר מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ.
The Gemara responds: There is no contradiction. Prior to removal of the ashes, one raises the Basin and then sinks it again so that it will not remain raised at dawn and render the water disqualified.
אִי הָכִי, ״לְמָחָר אֵינוֹ מְקַדֵּשׁ״ – [אַמַּאי? אֵין צָרִיךְ לְקַדֵּשׁ.]
The Gemara asks: If so, why does Rabbi Yoḥanan say that the priest does not sanctify his hands and feet again the next day? If the water has not been disqualified, why would the priest need to avoid sanctifying his hands and feet with it? The Gemara responds: Rabbi Yoḥanan means to say that he does not need to sanctify them again for service on the same day, not that he is prohibited from doing so.
לְמֵימְרָא דִּלְמַתִּירִין מִיחְזָא חֲזֵי?! הַיְינוּ דְּרַב חִסְדָּא!
The Gemara asks: Is this to say that according to Rabbi Yoḥanan, if one raised the Basin at night and sank it again before dawn, it remains fit for sanctification prior to performing the offering’s permitting factors that day? If so, Rabbi Yoḥanan’s opinion is the same as that of Rav Ḥisda.
אִיכָּא בֵּינַיְיהוּ מִצְוַת שִׁיקּוּעַ.
The Gemara responds: The difference between them is that according to Rav Ḥisda, there is no mitzva of sinking the Basin into its pit throughout the night, whereas Rabbi Yoḥanan holds that there is a mitzva of sinking the Basin into its pit all night ab initio.
מֵיתִיבִי: לֹא הָיוּ רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ וְלֹא שׁוֹמְעִין אֶת קוֹלוֹ, עַד שֶׁשּׁוֹמְעִים קוֹל שֶׁל עֵץ שֶׁעָשָׂה בֶּן קָטִין מוּכְנִי לַכִּיּוֹר, וְהֵן אוֹמְרִים: הִגִּיעַ [עֵת] קִידּוּשׁ יָדַיִם וְרַגְלַיִם מִן הַכִּיּוֹר. מַאי, לָאו דִּמְסַלֵּק לֵיהּ? אַלְמָא מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ!
The Gemara raises an objection to the opinion of Rav Ḥisda from a mishna (Tamid 28b): The priests would not see the priest performing the removal of the ashes, nor would they hear his voice. Rather, they were unaware of his actions until they would hear the sound of the wood with which ben Katin made a mechanism for sinking the Basin into water during the night. And when they heard the sound of the mechanism, they would say to each other: The time for sanctifying hands and feet from the Basin has come. The Gemara asks: What, is it not that they heard the mechanism raising the Basin? Apparently, the mechanism would sink it during the night, in contradiction to the opinion of Rav Ḥisda, who holds that there was no need to sink it overnight.
לָא, דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ. אִי דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ – מִי מִשְׁתְּמַע קָלֵיהּ?! מְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ בְּגִילְגְּלָא.
The Gemara responds: No, they heard the mechanism sinking the Basin, which had been raised all night. The Gemara asks: If the mechanism were sinking it, would its sound be audible? No mechanism is necessary to lower the Basin; it can simply be lowered with a chain. The Gemara responds: The priest would still sink it by using a wheel, which would make a sound.
לִישָּׁנָא אַחֲרִינָא: דִּמְשַׁקַּע לֵיהּ בְּחוּמַרְתֵּיהּ, כִּי הֵיכִי דְּלִישְׁתְּמַע קָלֵיהּ וְלִשְׁמְעִי וְלֵיתֵי. וְהָא הֲוָה גְּבִינִי כָּרוֹז! (בי) [אַבֵּי] תְּרֵי הֶיכֵּרֵי הֲווֹ עָבְדִי; דְּשָׁמַע מֵהַאי אָתֵי, וְשָׁמַע מֵהַאי אָתֵי.
The Gemara presents another version of the answer: The priest would deliberately sink it by its wheel so that its sound would be audible, and the other priests would hear and come to begin the service. The Gemara asks: But wasn’t there Gevini the crier, who would notify the priests of the beginning of the service? The Gemara responds: They would make two conspicuous markers for the beginning of the service: The sound of the wheel and the crier. Anyone who heard from this marker would come, and anyone who heard from that marker would come.
גּוּפָא – אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא: כׇּל כִּיּוֹר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ כְּדֵי לְקַדֵּשׁ אַרְבָּעָה כֹּהֲנִים מִמֶּנּוּ – אֵין מְקַדְּשִׁין בּוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְרָחֲצוּ מִמֶּנּוּ מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו וְגוֹ׳״.
§ Having mentioned a halakha earlier (19b), the Gemara addresses the matter itself: Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, says: With regard to any Basin that does not contain enough water for four priests to sanctify their hands and feet from it, the priests may not sanctify their hands and feet with it, as it is stated: “That Moses and Aaron and his sons might wash their hands and their feet from it” (Exodus 40:31).
מֵיתִיבִי: כׇּל הַכֵּלִים מְקַדְּשִׁין – בֵּין שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן רְבִיעִית,
The Gemara raises an objection from a baraita: The priests may sanctify their hands and feet from all vessels, whether they can hold a quarter-log of water
